Resilience in real estate investment
article

Real estate stays resilient as investors diversify: key signals from ULI–PwC

Across global real estate markets, sentiment is improving even as pricing, policy, and geopolitics keep risk elevated. The latest ULI–PwC signals point to a sector that is stabilizing: capital is returning selectively, underwriting is becoming more disciplined, and investors are widening their opportunity set beyond traditional “core” plays. Resilience is showing up most clearly where income is durable, supply is constrained, and strategies can adapt—through repositioning, operational improvements, and a sharper focus on sustainability and tenant needs.

5 min time to read

A cautious rebound: resilience without euphoria

ULI–PwC indicators describe a market moving from reset to repair. Transaction volumes and bid-ask spreads remain influenced by the lagging effects of rate hikes and refinancing pressure, yet investor appetite is re-emerging for assets with clear cash-flow visibility. The resilience theme is less about rapid price appreciation and more about the ability of certain segments to maintain occupancy, sustain rent collections, and defend net operating income amid higher debt costs.

What stands out is the shift in expectations: return targets are being recalibrated, not abandoned. Many investors are accepting that the path back to liquidity will be uneven, and that success will depend on property-level execution rather than broad market beta.

Diversification becomes a primary risk tool

As volatility persists, diversification is increasingly used to manage both macro and sector-specific risk. Instead of concentrating allocations in a small set of gateway cities and traditional property types, capital is spreading across geographies, tenant industries, and lease structures. This includes a growing willingness to pair stabilized income assets with value-add repositioning or development-light strategies, creating portfolios that can perform across different economic scenarios.

In practice, diversification also means moving along the capital stack. Investors are blending equity with private credit, preferred equity, and structured solutions to balance yield needs with downside protection, especially where asset repricing has not fully cleared.

Private capital and debt strategies gain influence

ULI–PwC observations highlight how real estate debt has become a central channel for deployment. Higher base rates have made senior lending more attractive on a risk-adjusted basis, while refinancing gaps have increased demand for mezzanine debt, bridge lending, and rescue capital. This environment favors investors with underwriting depth and asset-management capacity, as loan outcomes are tied closely to business plans and tenant performance.

For borrowers, debt availability is more segmented: prime assets and experienced sponsors can still secure capital, while secondary properties face stricter covenants, lower leverage, and wider spreads. That selectivity is reinforcing resilience in higher-quality stock and accelerating repricing pressure on weaker assets.

Operational excellence replaces passive ownership

Resilience is increasingly operational. Owners are leaning into active asset management to defend income: upgrading amenities, re-tenanting creatively, optimizing service contracts, and using data to improve leasing and retention. Inflation in labor, insurance, and utilities has made expense management as important as rent growth in determining returns.

Markets are rewarding properties that deliver a clear tenant value proposition. This is evident in sectors where service intensity is higher, such as residential and hospitality-adjacent formats, where operational improvements can translate directly into pricing power and stronger margins.

Logistics and industrial: demand normalizes, fundamentals stay solid

Industrial remains a core pillar of perceived resilience, even as the post-pandemic surge in leasing cools. Demand is normalizing toward more sustainable levels, but structural drivers, such as e-commerce, supply-chain reconfiguration, and last-mile delivery, continue to support occupancy and rent potential in well-located corridors. New supply has increased in some markets, making micro-location and building specification more important than broad regional exposure.

Investors are differentiating between commodity big-box products and assets tailored to modern logistics needs. Functional obsolescence, power capacity, yard depth, and access to labor pools are increasingly central to underwriting assumptions.

Living sectors broaden beyond traditional apartments

Housing-related strategies are drawing attention as affordability constraints and limited new supply underpin demand. Alongside conventional multifamily, diversification is pulling capital toward single-family rental portfolios, build-to-rent communities, student housing, and senior living, each with distinct demand drivers and operating requirements. The common thread is recurring need-based demand and the ability to reprice rents over time, though regulation and local politics can materially affect outcomes.

Investors are underwriting living sectors with greater sensitivity to operating costs and capex. Property taxes, insurance, and maintenance inflation can erode headline rent gains, making disciplined expense assumptions and resident retention strategies critical.

Office: a bifurcated market accelerates repricing

The ULI–PwC narrative continues to emphasize office as the most divided segment. Top-tier, well-located, highly amenitized buildings can still attract tenants, while many older assets face elevated vacancy, shorter lease terms, and rising concession packages. This divergence is pushing investors to separate “fixable” from “stranded” properties, with the latter increasingly priced around alternative uses or long-dated repositioning risk.

Where capital engages, it often does so through targeted strategies: selective recapitalizations, debt acquisitions, or conversions. Underwriting tends to hinge on realistic leasing velocity, tenant improvement budgets, and the feasibility of meeting modern ESG and wellness expectations.

Retail and hospitality: cash-flow stories return to the foreground

Retail’s resilience is most visible in necessity-based formats and locations with constrained supply. Neighborhood centers anchored by grocery and services can offer steady income, while experiential and well-curated high-street assets may benefit from footfall recovery. At the same time, weaker discretionary formats remain vulnerable to shifting consumer behavior and tenant credit risk.

Hospitality and lodging-related investments are being assessed through a cash-flow lens that values flexibility. Daily pricing allows faster inflation pass-through, but performance is sensitive to labor constraints, travel demand cycles, and capex needs. Investors are focusing on markets with durable demand generators and assets where renovation can reposition rate and occupancy.

Climate and ESG move from reporting to pricing

ULI–PwC signals reinforce that sustainability considerations are increasingly embedded in valuation. Transition risk, physical climate exposure, and regulatory compliance are influencing both financing terms and tenant decisions. Properties with credible decarbonization pathways, efficient systems, and strong disclosure practices may access capital more easily, while laggards face higher capex requirements and potential liquidity discounts.

Investors are prioritizing practical interventions with measurable outcomes. Common focus areas include energy retrofits, electrification, resilience upgrades, and better monitoring. The goal is not only compliance, but also improved operating performance and reduced volatility in long-term cash flows.

Where investors see opportunity: mispricing, recapitalizations, and selective development

Opportunity is emerging where market repricing has created gaps between intrinsic value and forced-sale dynamics. Recapitalizations are a prominent theme, as owners facing loan maturities or covenant pressure seek new equity partners or structured solutions. For investors, these situations can offer attractive entry points provided business plans are grounded in realistic leasing, capex, and exit assumptions.

Development is returning selectively, primarily in segments with strong demand and limited supply pipelines. Underwriting is more conservative: higher contingencies, tighter phasing, and deeper pre-leasing requirements are common. Many players favor strategies that reduce entitlement and construction risk, such as brownfield infill, adaptive reuse where feasible, and expansions tied to committed tenants.

You like this article?
This article is written by:
Ice Halili

Writer focused on delivering informative, accessible content

Op al onze artikelen zijn auteursrechten van toepassing. Iets op te merken? Neem contact met ons op

Related articles